小程序
传感搜
传感圈

The Biden Administration Must Designate Civilian Satellites Critical Infrastructure

2022-08-08
关注

For five days in 2021, gas on the Eastern Seaboard of the U.S. stopped flowing. People began to panic-buy at the pumps and cancel trips.

A Russian criminal group with suspected ties to its government had hacked into Colonial Pipeline and demanded a $5 million payment. Weeks later, the Biden administration made clear it would not tolerate such attacks, giving Russia a list of 16 critical U.S. infrastructure sectors that the administration declared off-limits, including the energy sector. It is easy to understand why energy infrastructure deserves protection, not to mention health care, food, chemical manufacturing and the rest of the list of 16, but in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the prospect of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a new sector needs to be on the list of critical infrastructure: civilian satellites.

Whether facilitating services like weather forecasting and GPS navigation or supplying imagery that informs stock trades, civilian satellites are a vital resource in the 21st century. Any attack on them— whether physical or computer-mediated—could catastrophically disrupt daily life. A successful hack could prevent cargo ships from navigating the oceans or disrupting critical telecommunications services. Worse still, an attack on a civilian satellite that disrupts its navigation capabilities, or ability to send and receive data, stands to turn it into space debris that can disable other critical space objects.

Calling civilian satellites critical infrastructure communicates to other countries that these objects would be exempt from the standard espionage operations, the hacking, and some cases, the attacks that other countries conduct against the U.S. as part of normal foreign affairs. In turn, the U.S. government carries out similar operations against other nation’s military and government agencies. Should someone disrupt or destroy these satellites’ functions, it would elicit some sort of retaliatory response from the U.S. government.

Without that designation, hacking operations can target civilian satellites. In the hours preceding its invasion of Ukraine, Russian military intelligence units hacked into the European Internet service provider Viasat and wiped many of its customers’ modems. The attack did not touch Viasat’s network of satellites, but it nonetheless achieved its intended effect of blocking many users from accessing the Internet through these systems. If the attackers had chosen a different method of attack, Viasat’s satellites could have easily been in Russia’s crosshairs. In May, the National Security Agency issued a warning to operators of very-small-aperture terminal (VSAT) satellite networks, including civilian operators, to protect their computer networks. The warning was prompted by Russian cyber activity during the invasion of Ukraine and was likely instigated by intelligence showing Russian targeting of U.S. satellites.

And it’s not just Russia. Although the risk of China invading Taiwan is hotly debated among scholars, the actions that would precede such an invasion are not in dispute. Satellites are at the top of the target list for Beijing. China is likely to target satellites in any attempted invasion for the purposes of causing panic among civilians or disrupting and degrading Taiwanese and U.S. military command-and-control. A Chinese military researcher recently published an article arguing that China’s military must be able to take down StarLink satellites, as the civilian Internet-providing constellation poses a threat to the nation. China’s threat is not just theoretical. The Center for Strategic and International Studies’ timeline of attacks on U.S. and other satellites by China notes eight separate attacks, most of which were against NASA satellites. A possible Taiwan crisis illustrates what’s at stake: civilian satellites may well end up in the crosshairs.

It is imperative that civilian satellites not become casualties of war and conflict. Other nations have already attacked civilian satellites in the U.S. and around the world. Their critical functions in daily life are too great to be ignored. A designation of their status as critical infrastructure would demonstrate to other countries that the U.S. will not tolerate attacks that disrupt or degrade their function. We must act now before another global crisis lurches us towards unintended consequences for civilians.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

参考译文
拜登政府必须指定民用卫星为关键基础设施
2021年,美国东海岸的天然气中断了5天。人们开始在加油站抢购,取消行程。一个疑似与俄罗斯政府有关联的犯罪集团入侵了殖民管道公司,并要求支付500万美元。几周后,拜登政府明确表示不会容忍此类攻击,并向俄罗斯提供了一份清单,其中包括政府宣布禁止进入的16个美国关键基础设施领域,包括能源领域。能源基础设施值得保护的原因很容易理解,更不用说医疗、食品、化工以及上述16个领域,但在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰、中国大陆可能入侵台湾之后,一个新的领域需要被列入关键基础设施的名单:民用卫星。无论是为天气预报和GPS导航等服务提供便利,还是为股票交易提供信息,民用卫星都是21世纪的重要资源。对它们的任何攻击——无论是物理攻击还是计算机介导的攻击——都可能对日常生活造成灾难性的破坏。一次成功的黑客攻击可能会阻止货船在海洋中航行或扰乱关键的电信服务。更糟糕的是,如果对民用卫星进行攻击,破坏其导航能力或发送和接收数据的能力,它可能会变成空间碎片,使其他关键的空间物体失效。将民用卫星称为关键基础设施,是在向其他国家传达这样一个信息:这些物体将免受标准的间谍行动、黑客活动,以及其他国家作为正常外交事务的一部分对美国进行的攻击。反过来,美国政府也会对其他国家的军队和政府机构采取类似的行动。如果有人干扰或摧毁这些卫星的功能,就会引发美国政府的某种报复反应。没有这个名称,黑客行动就可以以民用卫星为目标。在入侵乌克兰的几个小时前,俄罗斯军事情报部门侵入了欧洲互联网服务提供商Viasat,清除了该公司许多客户的调制解调器。这次攻击并未触及Viasat公司的卫星网络,但却达到了阻止许多用户通过这些系统访问互联网的预期效果。如果袭击者选择了另一种攻击方式,Viasat的卫星很容易就会被俄罗斯瞄准。今年5月,美国国家安全局(National Security Agency)向包括民用运营商在内的甚小孔径终端(VSAT)卫星网络运营商发出警告,以保护他们的计算机网络。这一警告是由俄罗斯入侵乌克兰期间的网络活动引发的,很可能是受到情报显示俄罗斯瞄准美国卫星的煽动。不仅仅是俄罗斯。尽管学者们对中国大陆入侵台湾的风险争论不休,但在入侵之前的行动却没有争议。卫星是中国政府的首要目标。在任何企图入侵的行动中,中国都可能将卫星作为攻击目标,目的是在平民中引起恐慌,或扰乱和削弱台湾和美国的军事指挥和控制。一位中国军事研究人员最近发表了一篇文章,认为中国军队必须有能力击落星链卫星,因为民用互联网提供星座对国家构成了威胁。中国的威胁不仅仅是理论上的。战略与国际研究中心(Center for Strategic and International Studies)关于中国攻击美国和其他卫星的时间表提到了8次单独的攻击,其中大多数是针对美国宇航局(NASA)的卫星。一场可能发生的台湾危机说明了其中的利害关系:民用卫星很可能最终成为目标。 民用卫星绝不能成为战争和冲突的牺牲品。其他国家已经攻击了美国和世界各地的民用卫星。它们在日常生活中的重要作用不容忽视。将其列为关键基础设施将向其他国家表明,美国不会容忍破坏或削弱其功能的攻击。我们现在必须采取行动,以免另一场全球危机给平民带来意想不到的后果。这是一篇观点和分析文章,作者或作者所表达的观点不一定是《科学美国人》的观点。
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘