In 2009, when Qatar placed its bid to host the men’s World Cup, many wondered how a country so hot—summer temperatures can exceed 110 degrees Fahrenheit—could host a soccer tournament. To quell those concerns, Qatar built air-conditioned outdoor stadiums. This move could inspire other sporting venues to use such technology to protect the health of athletes and fans. But this is a flawed solution that is not environmentally sustainable, experts say, despite efforts to power AC systems with green energy sources.
The idea of putting energy-guzzling air-conditioning into open-air, roofless stadiums has added to Qatar’s long list of controversies (ranging from alleged bribery to reported human rights abuses). The host country promises that the AC systems now in use in seven of its eight World Cup stadiums have been built with sustainability in mind. According to the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA), global soccer’s governing body, the outdoor ACs will draw energy from solar panels and shoot cool air only to the parts of the stadium that need it the most—namely, the seats and the field.
But experts doubt that AC systems in outdoor stadiums could ever truly be sustainable. Shelie Miller, a sustainability expert at the University of Michigan, who has studied refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, says that air-conditioning is a major source of global greenhouse gas emissions. This is linked to both its strain on the electricity grid and faulty AC units that leak refrigerant chemicals—which are potent greenhouse gasses. This emissions problem is likely to get worse over time because the global use of indoor air-conditioning is expanding rapidly. With outdoor AC tech readily available, it may sound like an easy fix for heat-related illnesses at athletic competitions, an issue that plagued the 2020 Tokyo Olympics and will affect more events as the climate crisis continues. But “from an energy perspective, that’s a pretty bad idea,” Miller says, because much of the cold air escapes into the open environment. “There’s a reason that we close our windows when we run our air conditioners.”
One way to make stadium AC more efficient would be to employ it only in closed stadiums, not ones with open-air roofs like Qatar’s, says Jessica Murfree, a sport ecologist at Texas A&M University. But “it’s hard to imagine a world where all sport exists indoors,” she admits. “It’s hard for me to think about a football season or baseball season without rain, without snow, without direct sunlight, without the occasional bird landing on the field.”
Miller acknowledges that Qatar’s engineers have tried to make the AC systems more energy efficient by employing “spot cooling” to direct cool air only to the areas that need it. But “improving the energy efficiency of a huge load of electricity still means you have a huge load of electricity,” she says.
And although Qatar promises that its AC systems will use solar power, Miller thinks that isn’t good enough. “The materials that renewable energy technologies are made of are not infinite—so there are still planetary limits on our being able to produce energy” with renewable technology, she says. “Just because we have access to renewable technologies doesn’t give us a blank check to spend energy wherever.” A spokesperson for FIFA contacted by Scientific American was unable to clarify whether the AC systems for Qatar’s stadiums run entirely on solar power or just partially.
Still, cooling technology is appealing for a World Cup hosted in one of the world’s hottest countries. Although FIFA decided to break with tradition and move the men’s World Cup from Qatar’s scorching summer months to its cooler winter, temperatures in Doha, Qatar, in the coming weeks are expected to be fairly hot, in the 70s and 80s of degrees F. Even warm temperatures can put people at risk of heat illness, says Stephen Lewandowski, an expert in environmental health and risk assessment at the Uniformed Services University.
Lewandowski says that heat illness exists along a spectrum, where every increase in degrees F brings a greater risk of more severe ailments. At the lower end of the spectrum, physical exercise in warm temperatures can put pressure on the cardiovascular system and cause kidney stress, he explains. On the more extreme side, “the body becomes unable to compensate for the heat and the core body temperature rises. And that’s where you get to the really dangerous conditions, moving from heat exhaustion into potential heat stroke,” Lewandowski says.
He points out, however, that soccer players are physically fit and therefore have fewer risk factors for heat illness than the average person. Soccer fans in the stands, particularly young children, the elderly and people with underlying health conditions, could be more vulnerable to heat risks than players are. “Having that air-conditioning in the stadium, which can lower the temperature, along with possibly providing a bit more air movement along the field, can protect the athletes from heat stress” and create a more comfortable environment for fans and stadium workers, Lewandowski says. “Each degree cooler can reduce the risk of heat illness.”
Besides keeping people safe, stadium air-conditioning may also allow players to perform better, says Carl James, a sports scientist and physiologist at the Hong Kong Sports Institute. “There’s plenty of evidence that, in warmer climates, [soccer players’] physical performance is impaired,” he says. This can lead to tactical changes: “players undertake fewer sprints, they elect to pass the ball more, and passes are generally shorter.” Using air-conditioning should lead to faster-paced games where players have the bodily confidence to sprint more and take greater risks, James suggests. “In really hot conditions, you just can’t afford to expend that sort of energy because you’ll feel terrible for the next part of the game,” he says. But James adds that those results would depend on the efficiency of Qatar’s stadium AC systems. He would want to know “How consistent is the airflow across the [field]?” and “How significant is the temperature reduction?” he says. When contacted for comment by Scientific American, FIFA spokespeople didn’t offer specific answers to these questions.
These advantages come at a high price: using outdoor AC as a response to a warming world is very expensive. Such solutions, Murfree says, are only likely to make sports less accessible. Climate control technology like air-conditioning “demands more resources and money and time to manage and maintain, so fewer and fewer people will have access to [sports],” she says, if these technologies become the norm for competition at an advanced level.
There are less costly—and more sustainable—alternatives to keep sports players safe from heat stress. One significant (and simple) option is to give players time to acclimate to hot temperatures, James says. The human body is resilient, and spending some time living and training in the heat prior to a tournament can go a long way toward protecting players from heat illness. Unfortunately, many players didn’t get much of an acclimation period leading into the World Cup this November. “Because this World Cup is happening smack bang in the middle of the usual European playing season..., you’ve got people coming from a cold European winter straight into a warmer climate,” James says.
A less time-intensive option, Lewandowski suggests, would be adding more breaks into games when high heat becomes a real concern. He also points to a number of other simple fixes that can help players manage heat stress. Cooling vests and similar garments use ice packs or the circulation of chilly liquids to keep wearers cool, although Lewandowski thinks these might be too bulky to be used during soccer matches. Then there’s “extremity cooling, like dipping your arms in cold water before you go into an event, which can help keep you cool and maintain performance,” he explains. And, of course, hydration is key: there’s ongoing research into what types of liquids (such as ice slurries) might best keep the body cool.
In other words, there are lots of potential methods to help players beat the heat. Stadium air-conditioning, theoretically, is one of them—but it comes at a high cost to the environment. Miller describes “this huge positive feedback loop” where “air-conditioning is causing climate change, and we need air-conditioning to respond to climate change.” Bringing massive outdoor stadiums into that equation would only make the problem worse.
“If we really are trying to obtain a sustainable future, the cooling of open-air stadiums is not how we get there,” Miller says.